Skip to content
Alternatives.toolsSubmit a tool

Apps with Serverless functions

10 apps

Top Serverless functions apps ranked by the community

  1. Vercel

    Vercel is a cloud platform for deploying web apps, run by the company behind Next.js. Connecting a Git repository gives automatic builds, a preview URL for every pull request and delivery from a global edge network, with serverless and edge functions for dynamic code. It also offers analytics, storage integrations and AI tooling. A free Hobby plan suits personal projects; paid plans cover teams.

    10 Vercel alternatives

    Pros

    • First-class Next.js support from the company that builds it
    • Automatic builds and a preview URL for every pull request
    • Global edge network with serverless and edge functions

    Cons

    • Usage-based costs can jump sharply when traffic spikes
    • The free Hobby plan is limited to personal, non-commercial use
    • Some features are tied to Next.js, which raises lock-in concerns
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Hosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    AnalyticsCustom domainsGit integrationPreview deploymentsServerless functionsTemplates
    Visit websiteMore about Vercel

  2. Netlify

    Netlify is a hosting and deployment platform that builds sites straight from a Git repository and serves them from a global network. Every pull request gets a deploy preview, and serverless functions, edge functions, form handling and build plugins cover dynamic needs without managing a server. It works with most frontend frameworks and static site generators, and offers a free plan alongside paid tiers for teams.

    10 Netlify alternatives

    Pros

    • Deploy previews for every pull request, straight from Git
    • Built-in forms, serverless and edge functions without managing servers
    • Works with most frontend frameworks and static site generators

    Cons

    • Costs can rise quickly as traffic and build usage grow
    • Less suited to long-running backends or heavy server workloads
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Hosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    Custom domainsGit integrationPlugins & extensionsPreview deploymentsServerless functions
    Visit websiteMore about Netlify

  3. Cloudflare Pages

    Cloudflare Pages builds sites from a Git repository or direct uploads and serves them from Cloudflare's global network. It provides preview URLs for every branch, custom domains with automatic TLS and Pages Functions for server-side code on Workers. The free plan covers many small sites. Cloudflare now recommends Workers with static assets for new projects, while existing Pages projects remain supported.

    8 Cloudflare Pages alternatives

    Pros

    • Generous free plan for static and small sites
    • Served from Cloudflare’s global network with automatic TLS
    • Preview URL for every branch, plus Functions running on Workers

    Cons

    • Cloudflare now steers new projects toward Workers instead
    • Workers runtime is not full Node.js, so some libraries need adapting
    • Poorly suited to traditional backends or long-running processes
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Hosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    Custom domainsGit integrationPreview deploymentsServerless functions
    Visit websiteMore about Cloudflare Pages

  4. AWS Amplify

    AWS Amplify is a set of tools and services from Amazon Web Services for building full-stack web and mobile apps. Amplify Hosting deploys frontends from Git with pull request previews and custom domains, while the backend side sets up authentication, data, storage and functions on AWS services, defined in TypeScript code. Its open source client libraries cover JavaScript, React Native, Swift, Android and Flutter.

    12 AWS Amplify alternatives

    Pros

    • Git-based hosting with pull request previews and custom domains
    • Sets up auth, data, storage and functions on AWS from TypeScript code
    • Client libraries for JavaScript, React Native, Swift, Android and Flutter

    Cons

    • Ties your backend closely to AWS services
    • Debugging often means digging into the underlying AWS consoles
    • Usage-based AWS billing can be hard to predict
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Hosting & DeploymentBackend as a Service
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    Built-in databaseCustom domainsFile storageGit integrationPreview deploymentsServerless functions
    Visit websiteMore about AWS Amplify

  5. Firebase

    Firebase is Google's platform for building web and mobile apps without running your own servers. It provides Cloud Firestore and the Realtime Database, authentication, Cloud Storage, Cloud Functions, hosting, analytics, crash reporting and push messaging, with SDKs for iOS, Android, web, Flutter and Unity, plus Gemini-based AI features. A free Spark plan suits prototypes, with usage-based billing beyond it.

    8 Firebase alternatives

    Pros

    • Complete toolkit from auth and databases to hosting and crash reports
    • Mature SDKs for iOS, Android, web, Flutter and Unity
    • The free Spark plan is enough for prototypes

    Cons

    • Usage-based billing can spike unexpectedly with traffic or inefficient queries
    • Firestore’s NoSQL model makes complex queries and reporting awkward
    • Strong lock-in to Google Cloud services
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Backend as a ServiceHosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    AnalyticsFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Firebase

  6. Supabase

    111.4Kstars

    Supabase is an open source backend platform built on Postgres. Each project gets a full Postgres database with auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, authentication, file storage, realtime subscriptions, edge functions and vector support for AI applications. It can be used as a hosted service with a free tier or self-hosted with Docker, and appeals to developers who want SQL rather than a NoSQL backend.

    8 Supabase alternatives

    Pros

    • Full Postgres database with SQL, extensions and row-level security
    • Auto-generated APIs, auth, storage and realtime in one platform
    • Open source and self-hostable with Docker

    Cons

    • Free-tier projects are paused after a period of inactivity
    • Self-hosting is more involved to set up than the managed service
    • Row-level security policies take time to get right
    Cost / License
    FreemiumOpen source
    Categories
    Backend as a Service
    Platforms
    WebSelf-hosted
    Features
    API accessBuilt-in databaseFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Supabase

  7. Appwrite

    57.6Kstars

    Appwrite is an open source backend server that bundles authentication, databases, file storage, serverless functions, messaging and realtime events behind one consistent API, with SDKs for web, mobile and Flutter. Since 2025 it also hosts websites and web apps through Appwrite Sites. It can be self-hosted with Docker or used through Appwrite Cloud, which has a free plan.

    8 Appwrite alternatives

    Pros

    • Auth, database, storage, functions and messaging behind one API
    • Open source and straightforward to self-host with Docker
    • SDKs for web, mobile and Flutter apps

    Cons

    • Database queries are more limited than raw SQL
    • Self-hosted upgrades between versions can require careful migrations
    Cost / License
    FreemiumOpen source
    Categories
    Backend as a ServiceHosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    WebSelf-hosted
    Features
    Built-in databaseFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Appwrite

  8. Convex

    12.7Kstars

    Convex is a backend platform for app developers in which the database schema, queries, mutations and server functions are all written in TypeScript. Queries are reactive, so connected clients update automatically when data changes, with no manual caching. It also includes file storage, scheduled jobs, search and authentication. Convex Cloud has a free tier, and the backend can be self-hosted under the FSL license.

    8 Convex alternatives

    Pros

    • Schema, queries and functions are all written in TypeScript
    • Reactive queries update clients automatically, with no caching code
    • Scheduled jobs, search, file storage and auth included

    Cons

    • Its own data model differs from SQL, which makes migrating away harder
    • The FSL license is source available, not open source
    • TypeScript-centric, less suited to teams using other backend languages
    Cost / License
    FreemiumSource available
    Categories
    Backend as a Service
    Platforms
    WebSelf-hosted
    Features
    Built-in databaseFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Convex

  9. Nhost

    9.4Kstars

    Nhost is an open source backend platform that combines a dedicated Postgres database, an instant GraphQL API powered by Hasura with realtime subscriptions, authentication, file storage and serverless functions. It also offers AI tooling such as vector embeddings. Projects run on Nhost Cloud, which has a free starter plan, or can be self-hosted, and a CLI supports local development.

    8 Nhost alternatives

    Pros

    • Dedicated Postgres database for each project
    • Instant GraphQL API with realtime subscriptions through Hasura
    • Open source, with a CLI for local development and self-hosting

    Cons

    • GraphQL-first approach adds a learning curve for REST-oriented teams
    • Smaller community and ecosystem than Supabase or Firebase
    Cost / License
    FreemiumOpen source
    Categories
    Backend as a Service
    Platforms
    WebSelf-hosted
    Features
    API accessBuilt-in databaseFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Nhost

  10. Back4app

    Back4app is a backend-as-a-service platform built on the open source Parse Server. It provides a database with auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, user authentication, file storage, Cloud Code functions and live queries, managed from a spreadsheet-like dashboard. The company also offers a container-based web deployment platform and an AI agent for building cloud backends. Free plans are available for prototyping.

    8 Back4app alternatives

    Pros

    • Built on open source Parse Server, which limits lock-in
    • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs for your data
    • Spreadsheet-like dashboard is approachable for beginners

    Cons

    • The Parse ecosystem is less active than newer backend platforms
    • Free plans are meant for prototypes; production needs a paid plan
    Cost / License
    FreemiumProprietary
    Categories
    Backend as a ServiceHosting & Deployment
    Platforms
    Web
    Features
    API accessBuilt-in databaseFile storageRealtime databaseServerless functionsUser authentication
    Visit websiteMore about Back4app