Apps with Webhooks
10 apps
Top Webhooks apps ranked by the community
Lemon Squeezy is a payments and storefront platform for software companies and creators. It acts as merchant of record, so it handles international sales tax and VAT, fraud and chargebacks on your behalf. It supports one-time products, subscriptions, software license keys, affiliate programs and email marketing. Stripe acquired it in 2024, and it charges a fee per transaction rather than a monthly plan.
6 Lemon Squeezy alternativesPros
- Acts as merchant of record and handles global sales tax and VAT for you
- Built-in license keys and subscriptions for software sellers
- No monthly plan, only fees per transaction
Cons
- Fees are higher than using a payment processor directly
- Product direction is less clear since the Stripe acquisition
- Storefront customization is fairly limited
Cost / LicenseFreemiumProprietaryCategoriesPlatformsSaleor is an open source, API-only commerce platform built with Python and Django, with everything exposed through a GraphQL API. It handles multi-channel catalogs, several currencies and warehouses, and extends through webhooks and apps, while the storefront is built separately with any framework. Teams can self-host it or use the managed Saleor Cloud.
6 Saleor alternativesPros
- GraphQL-first API built for headless storefronts
- Handles multiple channels, currencies and warehouses natively
- Open source Python stack, self-hosted or on Saleor Cloud
Cons
- The storefront must be built separately by developers
- Smaller ecosystem and community than mainstream platforms
Cost / LicenseFreemiumOpen sourceCategoriesPlatformsDocuSeal is an open source platform for creating fillable PDF forms and collecting e-signatures, available as a hosted service or a self-hosted Docker app. A drag-and-drop builder places signature and form fields on documents, and an API, webhooks and embeddable components let developers add signing to their own apps. The self-hosted version is free under AGPL-3.0, with paid Pro features.
9 DocuSeal alternativesPros
- Free self-hosted version that runs as a Docker app
- Drag-and-drop builder for signature and form fields
- Embeddable components and an API to add signing to your own app
Cons
- Some advanced features require a paid Pro plan
- Fewer business integrations than established signature vendors
- Self-hosting means managing your own backups and updates
Cost / LicenseFreemiumOpen sourceCategoriesPlatformsDocumenso is an open source e-signature platform built with a focus on transparency, so anyone can inspect how documents are signed and stored. It supports templates, signing order, direct signing links, teams, webhooks and an API, and can be self-hosted or used through the hosted service. The code is published under AGPL-3.0, with a free plan and paid plans for teams.
8 Documenso alternativesPros
- Open source code lets anyone inspect how documents are signed
- Self-host it or use the hosted service with a free plan
- API, webhooks and templates for developers and teams
Cons
- Younger product with fewer integrations than Docusign
- Self-hosting requires setting up a signing certificate and email delivery
Cost / LicenseFreemiumOpen sourceCategoriesPlatformsZapier is a no-code automation platform that connects thousands of web apps so that a trigger in one, such as a new form entry, starts actions in others. Beyond multi-step Zaps with filters and branching, it includes tables, interfaces, AI steps and agents that work across connected tools. A free plan covers simple workflows, and paid plans are priced by task volume.
8 Zapier alternativesPros
- Connects thousands of apps, so most tools are already supported
- Very easy to start with for non-technical users
- Tables, interfaces and AI agents go beyond simple Zaps
Cons
- Costs rise quickly as task volume grows
- Complex logic is clumsier to build than on a visual canvas like Make
- Cloud only, with no self-hosting option
Cost / LicenseFreemiumProprietaryCategoriesPlatformsMake, formerly Integromat and now part of Celonis, is a visual automation platform where workflows are built as scenarios on a canvas of connected modules. It handles routers, iterators, error handling and data mapping for complex processes across thousands of apps, plus HTTP calls, webhooks and AI agents. A free plan includes a monthly allowance of operations, with paid plans for more volume.
8 Make alternativesPros
- Visual canvas handles routers, iterators and error handling
- Finer data mapping than simpler automation tools
- HTTP module and webhooks connect to almost any API
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier for simple automations
- Operation counts add up quickly on complex or frequent scenarios
- Cloud only, with no self-hosting option
Cost / LicenseFreemiumProprietaryCategoriesPlatformsn8n is a workflow automation tool from Berlin that combines a visual node editor with the option to write JavaScript or Python, which suits technical teams. It offers hundreds of integrations, webhooks and AI agent nodes for building workflows around large language models. It can be self-hosted for free under the Sustainable Use License or used through the paid n8n Cloud.
9 n8n alternativesPros
- Free self-hosting keeps workflows and data on your own servers
- JavaScript or Python code nodes alongside the visual editor
- Capable AI agent nodes for building LLM workflows
Cons
- Sustainable Use License restricts some commercial uses, so it is not open source
- More technical than Zapier for non-developers
- Self-hosting means maintaining servers and updates yourself
Cost / LicenseFreemiumSource availableCategoriesPlatformsIFTTT, short for If This Then That, links apps, web services and smart home devices through small automations called applets, such as saving social posts to a spreadsheet or turning on lights at sunset. It is aimed at consumers and creators more than complex business processes, with mobile apps that provide location and phone triggers. A free plan allows a few applets; paid plans add more and multi-step logic.
7 IFTTT alternativesPros
- Very simple applets that anyone can set up in minutes
- Strong smart home support and phone triggers such as location
- Large library of ready-made applets
Cons
- The free plan allows only a few applets
- Multi-step logic requires a paid plan and stays basic for business use
- Some triggers fire with a noticeable delay
Cost / LicenseFreemiumProprietaryCategoriesPipedream is an integration platform for developers that runs event-driven workflows mixing prebuilt actions for thousands of apps with custom Node.js, Python, Go or Bash code. It also provides managed authentication and MCP servers so AI agents can call third-party APIs, and Workday announced its acquisition of the company in late 2025. A free tier with limited credits sits alongside paid plans.
8 Pipedream alternativesPros
- Mixes prebuilt actions with Node.js, Python, Go or Bash code
- Managed authentication for thousands of APIs
- MCP servers let AI agents call third-party apps
Cons
- Aimed at developers, less approachable for non-technical teams
- Free tier credits run out quickly on busy workflows
- The Workday acquisition adds uncertainty about the product’s direction
Cost / LicenseFreemiumProprietaryCategoriesPlatformsActivepieces is an open source automation platform positioned as an alternative to Zapier, with a visual flow builder, hundreds of integrations called pieces and AI agent steps. Pieces are written in TypeScript and are also exposed as MCP servers for AI assistants. The community edition is MIT-licensed and can be self-hosted; a hosted cloud version and an enterprise edition are also offered.
8 Activepieces alternativesPros
- MIT-licensed community edition can be self-hosted
- Pieces double as MCP servers for AI assistants
- Clean visual builder that is approachable for non-developers
Cons
- Smaller integration catalog than Zapier or Make
- Some enterprise features are reserved for paid editions
- Self-hosting means handling updates and scaling yourself
Cost / LicenseFreemiumOpen sourceCategoriesPlatforms
